Friday, January 27, 2012

Writing is "Thinking Made Visible"

Thursday in class we met in groups and worked on the short essays students were to post later on that same day. Students can also post their letters to the president there as well. Don't forget to respond to at least one letter and to mail your letter to President Obama at the White House. Let us know if you get a response.

Email is fine.

Homework was to read the first chapter along with preface and other precursors to the text for Tuesday. Bring in any questions. Except for essays, answers can be written in the book where apropos. Sometimes this works, for many of the questions for Chapter 1, this doesn't work.

The first section looks at the whole notion of Critical Thinking and defines it. There are many terms introduced. Annotate those areas of the text which interest you. At the end of each chapter there is a glossary.

Bring Yummy to class next week. We will start reading it, although I don't think the essay is due yet. We will write a definition essay and I think that is covered in Chapter 3 or 4. There will be a lot of collaborative work around exercises, just make sure you are prepared and again keep a list of questions you might develop as you read the text.

There are readings at the end of the book. You are encouraged, but not made to read them (smile). If I want you to read an essay, I will assign it in class. I think the articles illustrate the authors' point, and how can one become a great writer except by reading great writers?

Exercise 1B is an interesting take on intention, same information, different angle, different audience --different conclusion.

Writing As a Process (10-14) and A Quick Guide (210-214) are reviews. Writing Assignment 1 isn't due Monday. Let's make that due Thursday. Bring in the public issue that disturbs you to discuss with peers.

You have already completed Exercise 1C (17). If there is anything about yourself you'd like to add, send it on (smile). We will review Exercise 1D in class. I will lecture on Chapter 2 Thursday and the readings and some exercises will be due Tuesday.

I like Chapter 2, we discuss the difference between facts and judgements, ponder inferences using visual references like ads.

I love Chapter 3, The Structure of Argument. It is here the journey starts. Putting an argument into standard form is really fun (smile). Determining the difference between a premise and a conclusion is great work! Figuring out what an assumption is and how many assumptions fill many of our ethical operating manuals. The hidden assumptions are the hardest to shake.

The premise is the evidence, the conclusion is the argument. We don't do all th exercises, but since this is an election year, I might make Writing Assignment 5 extra credit (59).

In Chapter 4 we get down to the nitty gritty and learn about two kinds of thesis sentences: open and complete (81). We get more writing tips re: organization. I love the term "dialectic." It just means questioning both sides of an issue to come away with a sort of truth or synthesis, biases or slanted thinking disallow (85).

We will practice writing an essay in class where each group writes a different argument about the topic and then we pull all the angles together for a complete essay. Sounds strange, but it works (smile). This is where the authors introduce the Rogerian proof (87). Students are introduced to "joining words" (91-92).

Oh, Definition is in Chapter 5. Hum, we might have to wait longer than I thought to write this essay. Perhaps we should start with Mosley? Let's talk about this. I think the Mosely story lends itself well to the Rogerian argument.

Events next week

Poetry

The 22nd Annual African American Celebration through Poetry is Saturday, Feb. 4, 1-4 p.m. at the West Oakland Branch Library, 1801 Adeline Street, (510) 238-7352. I started this event 22 years ago, and I host it. This year the theme is great black women. All are welcome to attend. There is an open mic at the end of the program.

Author Event

Tim Wise, a great writer, is speaking at Cal State East Bay Thursday, Feb. 2, 2012, 7 PM. A former student called me to tell me about it this week. She is at CSEB now. It is a free event. Visit http://csueastbaytickets.universitytickets.com/user_pages/event.asp?id=164&cid=26

I have taught Wise's books for many years. He has a new book out: Dear White America: Letter to a New Minority.

If you'd like to go let me know Tuesday so we can figure out how we will meet. You can also drop me a line here. He is a great speaker, really great. We went to see him last Spring in conversation with Angela Davis (it wasn't free, but we had an anonymous donor).

We read his: White Like Me.

This is a Free Event Since 1995, Tim Wise has lectured at over 600 college institutions. In the early 90s, Wise worked as an anti-racist activist and began his work as a youth coordinator and associate director of the Louisiana Coalition Against Racism and Nazism. In New Orleans Tim Wise worked for various community-based organizations and political groups such as the Louisiana Coalition for Tax Justice, the Louisiana Injured Worker's Union and Agenda for Children.

Tim Wise has received several awards for his work and has written several books such as White Like Me: Reflections on Race from a Privileged Son, Between Barack and a Hard Place, Racism and White Denial in the Age of Obama, and Colorblind: The Rise of Post-Racial Politics and the Retreat from Racial Equity.

In Utne Reader magazine, Wise was listed as one of the "25 Visionaries Who Are Changing Your World" in 2010.

Location: MPR, New Union, Cal State East Bay
Contact information: ASI Diversity Center @ CSU East Bay, 510-885-3908

Film

At Stanford University, Tuesday, February 7, 7-9 PM in the Black Community Services Center there will be a screening of a We Still Live Here - Âs Nutayuneân. The director will be there as well as linguists. The film is about an indigenous nation which revived a "sleeping" language. The Wampanoag nation are the people who welcomed the Pilgrims and helped them through that difficult first winter in the New World. Remember that first Thanksgiving?

Visit: http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/we-still-live-here/film.html and http://www.makepeaceproductions.com/screenings/201201-stanford.jpg

I have seen the film. It is great! I had the director on my radio show this morning. She was my second interview. However, I studied linguistics when I was an undergraduate at UC Berkeley, so I might go. Again, let me know if you are interested.

Theatre

Marc Bamuthi Joseph's Word Becomes Flesh at Laney College, 900 Fallon Street, Oakland, February 11, 2012$25 gen. $15 students & seniors - 8pm. It is a collaboration between La Peña Cultural Center, Black Choreographers Here & Now, and the Living Word Festival.

Formally a solo performance, this male soul journey, is now danced by multiple men. In the work the characters question their masculinity, approaching fatherhood, relationships with their baby's mama, not to mention their fathers and father's fathers. It is a fluid tapestry that traverses landscapes above and below plane surfaces.

Bamuthi is a lovely choreographer and writer, so the poetry is in his character's feet as much in the words one hears from their mouths. I don't remember is they speak--when it was a solo work, Bamuthi spoke. I have only seen the work as a company performance once and alas, that detail escapes me. When I met the choreographer perhaps 15 years ago, is was as a poet. He was in a film screening I attended called: Slamnation.

This work is not as abstract as his last, performed at Yerba Buena Center for the Arts, Red, Black and Green, which was physical theatre as well as a visual art work, similar to site specific works used by Joanna Haigood, Zaccho Dance Company, and Alonozo King, LINES Contemporary Ballet.

Word Becomes Flesh is a fluid evening-length choreopoem written in the form of a narrative verse play. Presented as a series of performed letters to an unborn son, the piece uses poetry, dance and live music to document nine months of pregnancy from a young single father's perspective. These performed letters incorporate elements of ritual, archetypes, and symbolic sites within the constructs of hip hop culture. Directed by Marc Bamuthi Joseph, and featuring Daveed Diggs, Dahlak Brathwaite, Dion Decibels, Ben Turner, Mic Turner and B.Yung.

Word Becomes Flesh was originally commissioned by La Peña Cultural Center and premiered in November 2003 at the Alice Arts Center (Oakland, CA) and subsequently toured through 2007 nationwide to venues including Bates Dance Festival (Lewiston, ME), ODC Theater and Yerba Buena Center for the Arts (San Francisco, CA), On the Boards (Seattle, WA), New World Theater (Amherst, MA), Dance Theater Workshop (New York, NY), Live Arts Festival (Philadelphia, PA), Museum of Contemporary Art (Chicago, IL), University Musical Society (Ann Arbor, MI), Miami Dade College (Miami, FL), and Dance Place (Washington, DC).

Considered the seminal work of Marc Bamuthi Joseph and The Living Word Project, this piece was chosen by the National Performance Network for its 25th Anniversary Re-Creation Initiative supported in part by the National Endowment for the Arts. Word Becomes Flesh is a National Performance Network (NPN) Re-Creation Fund Project sponsored by La Peña Cultural Center (Berkeley, CA) in partnership with Painted Bride (Philadelphia, PA), Dance Place (Washington, DC), Youth Speaks (San Francisco, CA) and NPN. This project has been made possible by the National Endowment for the Arts as part of American Masterpieces: Three Centuries of Artistic Genius. For more information: www.npnweb.org.

More Film

The Indie Film Festival starts in San Francisco next month. The African Film Festival continues at Pacific Film Archive at UC Berkeley. The San Francisco International Film Festival is in April.

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Day 1

Today in class we took a fun "Aptitude Test," then reviewed the results which were kept private. I shared my horrible score (smile). Obviously these measures of intelligence are not the precise tools they claim to be, right? (smile).

I also gave students an article to read from the January 2012 issue of travel magazine, Skyways: "State of Mind: Are you a hamster thinker or do you think outside the box?" by Douglas Kruger (62-64). We will do more with the article on Thursday. Bring the annotated article to class Thursday as well.

We read aloud the syllabus, which I have revised a bit and will give students copies of on Thursday, those who would like one. I reviewed the homework and gave permission numbers to students who had purchased the textbooks at least the first three: Writing Logically, Thinking Critically, Yummy and The Tempest Tales.

For those students who would like to add the class, buy your books and I will give you one. I have to go now.

President Obama is walking into the U.S. House of Representatives. He is shaking hands and kissing cheeks. Smiling and making comments. He just kissed Barbara Lee. The other members of his entourage follow. I don't know most of these people, they are happy --one commenter said its like a pep-rally. I recognize Mrs. Clinton and the Senator who was shot in Arizona who is resigning. He shakes hands with the Supreme Court Justices. He stands in front of the folks, the camera shows the First Lady, beautiful in blue.

The hall is full. The speaker announces the president.

Here we go (smile).

State of the Union Cyber-Assignment

Homework Assignment 3 due: Thursday, Jan. 26, 2012

Watch and then read President Obama’s State of the Union Address.

Watch the commentaries and evaluations afterward as well. Bring in a typed response to the address. What was his argument? How in keeping was it re: policies and comments to that of prior addresses?

How was it different? What was most memorable? Why?

What if anything was left out? Why? (If you have theories.)

What moved you the most in the speech and touched on an issue close to your heart?

Evaluate the evidence. Was it strong? Did you in any way feel manipulated? Did you miss anything in the oral presentation, you were more aware of once you saw the speech in print? What was this?

Write your response in the form of a letter to President Obama. One page responses are fine for homework assignments. If you want to write more, you can. Make the letter personal. Mail it to him and keep us posted as to whether or not he responds.

I listened to KPFA 94.1 FM pre-speech analysis and speculation. There I learned of a preview of his speech on the President's campaign website on YouTube. For KPFA coverage, visit: http://www.kpfa.org

I also watched the NewsHour on PBS. They will have pre-and post talk and more on their website: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2012/01/excerpts-of-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address.html

On channel 7, ABC, I watched their pre-speech coverage and news. The president will be on Diane Sawyer's show Thursday, January 26, his first interview of his campaign. Send her your questions: http://abcnews.go.com/WN/mailform?id=15430363

After class post your letter. Respond to one classmate's letter. If you want to post anonymously, you can. Send anonymous posts to me with your names via email, so you can have credit for the assignment.

Be respectful when commenting. We do not have to agree with one another. I think this makes discourse a lot more interesting. Remember when responding to the President to clearly articulate what "he says."

Critical Thinking Syllabus Spring 2012

Critical Thinking @ the College of Alameda with
Professor Wanda Sabir

ENG 5/ENG 211 Course codes: 21763/21777, Tuesday/Thursday 11:00 AM to 12:15 PM

Class Meetings: January 24-May 17
Location: Room A-202

Drop dates: February 4, Full-Term Credit Classes and Receive a Refund. Note: Short-term and open-entry classes must be dropped within three days of the first class meeting to receive a refund. Feb. 5 last day to add. Feb. 11 last day to file for Pass/No pass. Feb. 16 last day to drop w/out a W. Drop February 24, Full-Term Credit Classes Without “W” Appearing on Transcript; April 25 (w/W) and no refund.

Holidays: Feb. 6, 17-20; May 18, May 30; Spring Break: April 2-8 M-Su Spring Recess

Final Exam Week: May 19-25. We have no sitting final. Portfolios are due by May 25, 12 noon electronically. Last day of semester May 25. Class blog: http://sabirscoaenglish5.blogspot.com/

Syllabus for English 5/211: Critical Thinking in Reading and Writing

English 5/211, 3 semester units, about 6000 written words, develops the ability to analyze, criticize, and advocate ideas. Critical thinking looks at the relationship between language and logic, introduces rhetoric or persuasive writing and tools students can use to evaluate information based on facts, perceptions, assumptions, evidence, reasons, inferences, judgments, induction, deduction and conclusions. Vocabulary is introduced so that students have the proper tools to discuss faulty thinking or flaws in the reasoning process and name the more common fallacies.

This level composition assumes competency in prose writing and reading ability so that more attention can be devoted to ideas rather than to grammar and mechanics. Students who will most likely succeed in this course passed English 1A with a “B” or better.

We will look at the role of language and semantics in critical thinking, social communications and propaganda. Students will also look at the fundamentals of problem solving, including considering and evaluating alternative solutions and perspectives. We will write a series of four (4) – 2-4 page essays which are 1. Analytical, 2. Argumentative and 3. Comparative evaluative essays on pertinent topics around the themes explored in the texts. Each of the four essays will use the Classical or Aristotelian, the Rogerian and/or the Toulmin model of argument.

Topics will come from our texts, films, and discussions, current event topics, or historical issues with current relevance. Three essays will utilize one of the text books: Michelle Alexander's The New Jim Crow; Walter Mosley's The Tempest Tales; and Greg Neri’s Yummy: the Last Days of a Southside Shorty. Required in these essays will be inclusion of at least 1-2 scholarly articles on the topic and a works cited/bibliography page(s) which is not counted as part of the 2-4 pages. The fourth essay will be student choice based on a current issue of interest. The topic can be an argument or an analysis of an argument. All arguments will be presented orally and in written form.

Essays
We will start all the essays in class and have peer reviews; however, I expect the first draft to receive a passing grade. If this is not the case, I suggest said student enlist the support and assistance of a competent tutor.

If any paper does not receive a passing grade, said student will have to write an essay wherein he or she discusses in third person how the writer can correct the errors, and revise or rewrite the essay. These essays are due the following day or following class meeting.

Readings
We will read a book every 3-4 weeks, beginning with Yummy, then Mosley, ending with Alexander.

I like to use films as teaching aides, but given the tight schedule, we will probably only see clips of a few pertinent films. The film assignments will be cyber-assignments started in class. Cyber-assignments are turned in on-line and are about a 250 word fast draft. Each student needs to respond on-line to two other posts. Be respectful in your comments. Even though we are only meeting two hours and a half a week, students will have three hours of homework weekly, maybe more if one is a slow reader. We will try not to deviate from the schedule, as we have three books plus a textbook to get through, so don’t get behind (smile).

We will probably not complete any in-class essays, as there just isn’t enough time. Most essays will be submitted via Internet. Make sure you include the assignment and your name in the subject line. There will be one group project and presentation on logical fallacies (both inductive and deductive reasoning – one each) inspired by the texts or taken from the field of commercial art or politics. We will do this in class. Buy the books and start reading. The graphic novel is first.

The Plan
We will use the textbook: Writing Logically Thinking Critically, Sixth Edition, by Sheila Cooper and Rosemary Patton. It will give students theoretical basis to talk about the argument process. The book has exercises which we will complete in and outside of class meetings. Students are encouraged to develop study groups.

We will run the book chronologically:
Week 1: A Quick Guide to Integrating Research into Your Own Writing 210-214.

Practice pp: 210-214
Week 1-2: Chapters 1-2
Week 2-3: Chapters 2-3
Week 3-4: Chapters 3-4
Week 4-5: Chapters 4-5-6
Week 5-6: Chapter 6-7
Week 6-7: Chapter 7-8
Week 8/9: Review
Week 9/10: Review
(This is ambitious.)

Grading
The essays based on readings are a fourth of your grade, the daily essays and/or homework are another fourth, your midterm and final are another fourth and your portfolio is the final fourth. (Save all of your work.) The midterm will probably be one of the essays connected to a book, perhaps Alexander, maybe Mosley’s, we’ll see. You can average the grades to see how to weigh the various components. Participation is included in the daily exercises and homework portion of the grade, so if your attendance is exemplary, yet you say nothing, you lose percentage points.

You will also need to spend at least an hour a week in the Writing Lab (L-234), or as needed, and have a teacher or tutor sign off on your assignments. If you are having trouble with grammar, then work on that. If you trouble is the essay writing process itself, work on that.

Have a tutor or teacher sign off on your essays before you turn them in; if you have a “R,” which means revision necessary for a grade or “NC-” which means “no credit,” you have to go to the lab and revise the essay with a tutor or teacher before you return both the graded original and the revision (with signature) to me. Also due with your revision is an essay about the essay which identifies the errors and how to correct them. Use a grammar/style book such as Diana Hacker’s Rules for Writers. Revise does not mean “rewrite,” it means to “see again.”

This course with limited class time should offer an invigorating discourse or dialogue for those students who love a challenge and approach the writing task eager, prepared and ready for what the course requires: English language fluency in writing and reading; a certain comfort and ease with the language; confidence and skillful application of literary skills associated with academic writing, plus familiarity, if not mastery, of the rhetorical styles used in argumentation, exposition and narration.

We will be evaluating what we know and how we came to know what we know, a field called epistemology or the study of knowledge. Granted, the perspective is western culture which eliminates the values of the majority populations, so-called underdeveloped or undeveloped countries or cultures. Let us not fall into typical superiority traps. Try to maintain a mental elasticity and a willingness to let go of concepts which not only limit your growth as an intelligent being, but put you at a distinct disadvantage as a species.

This is a highly charged and potentially revolutionary process - critical thinking. The process of evaluating all that you swallowed without chewing up to now is possibly even dangerous. This is one of the problems with bigotry; it is easier to go with tradition than toss it, and create a new, more just, alternative protocol.

Audience
This is not the class for the student who is not comfortable with writing essays, whose handle on grammar is shaky or loose, and/or whose reading skills – interpretation, critical analysis, comprehension and vocabulary, are limited. Obviously one cannot become an expert on anything meeting just twice a week for a little over two hours; however, the hope is that when you leave the course, you will be a stronger writer than when you arrived, have a better grasp of what is meant by rhetoric or the art of persuasion.

We will be honest with one another. Grades are not necessarily a complete assessment of one’s work; grades do not take into consideration the effort or time spent, only whether or not students can demonstrate mastery of a skill – in this case: essay writing. Grades are an approximation, arbitrary at best, no matter how many safeguards one tries to put in place to avoid such ambiguity. Suffice it to say, your portfolio will illustrate your competence. It will represent your progress, your success or failure this semester in meeting your goal.

Office Hours
I’d like to wish everyone good luck. I am available on Monday and Wednesday morning 10:30-12 noon, also Monday and Wednesday afternoon, 3-4 p.m. MTWTh from 3-5 by appointment, I am also available. Let me know the day before, if possible, when you’d like to meet with me. My office number is: 510. 748-2286. Ask me for my cell phone number. I do not mind sharing it with you. My email address again is: coasabirenglish5@gmail.com

I’d advise students to exchange phone numbers with classmates (3), so if you have a concern, it can be addressed more expediently. Again study groups are recommended, especially for those students finding the readings difficult; don’t forget, you can also discuss the readings as a group in the Lab with a teacher or tutor acting as facilitator. Keep a vocabulary log for the semester and an error chart (taken from comments on essay assignments). List the words you need to look up in the dictionary, also list where you first encountered them: page, book and definition, also use the word in a sentence. You will turn this in with your portfolio.

Students are expected to complete their work on time. If you need more time on an assignment, discuss this with me in advance, if possible, to keep full credit. You lose credit each day an assignment is late and certain assignments, such as in-class essays cannot be made up. All assignments prepared outside of class are to be typed, 12-pt. font, double-spaced lines, indentations on paragraphs, 1-inch margins around the written work (see Hacker: The Writing Process; Document Design.)

The class blog is: http://sabirscoaenglish5.blogspot.com

Cheating
Plagiarism is ethically abhorrent, and if any student tries to take credit for work authored by another person the result will be a failed grade on the assignment and possibly a failed grade in the course if this is attempted again. This is a graded course.

Homework
If you do not identify the assignment, I cannot grade it. If you do not return the original assignment you revised, with an analysis essay, I cannot compare what changed. If you accidentally toss out or lose the original assignment, you get a zero on the assignment to be revised. I will not look at revisions without the original attached- no exceptions.

We will have a library orientation: date and time TBA.

Jot down briefly what your goals are this semester. List them in order of importance.

1.



2.



3.



4.



5.


First Assignment: Write a letter of introduction to me. Tell me something about yourself: anything you'd like to share. It stays with me: where you were born, who you are responsible for (smile), what languages you speak/write, your strengths, what you bring to the class, what you'd like to leave with and what if anything I need to know to facilitate your success.

Email your letter to me: coasabirenglish5@gmail.com. Don't forget to note the assignment in the subject line. This assignment is due January 26 before class.

Second Assignments: Write a response to the syllabus and post it in the comment section on the blog. Be specific in your response. Post by January 25.



Something about me.

I don't hold hands. No time for it. I don't pressure people or threaten. If this is the kind of motivation you need, I am not the one. I expect everyone to be an adult, to exercise time management skills and to pace him or herself so that deadlines are met and that there is space in the plan for emergencies because nothing as I said is left to last minute rush. None of the material is a fast read—skimming might be possible, but this class will not be a cake walk, so plan for it—leave time in your schedule for it. A lot of work will be done outside class. Students will be bringing work to class to share after reading, after writing, so for the class to move, to jump to have energy, students need to stay on top of the work—we will see each other in class just 90 minutes a week, about 360 minutes in a 4-week month. Let's commit to making it fruitful.


Textbooks


We will travel through our five textbooks in the order mentioned. The Alexander book is the longest and the hardest read, so we will read it after we have completed most of our theoretical work:

Alexander, Michelle. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press, 2012.

Cooper, Sheila and Rosemary Patton. Writing Logically, Thinking Critically. Sixth Edition. New
York: Longman, 2010.

Mosley, Walter. The Tempest Tales. New York: Washington Square Press, 2008.

Neri, Greg. Yummy: the Last Days of a Southside Shorty. New York: Lee and Low Books, 2010.

Hacker, Diana. Rules for Writers. Fifth, Sixth or Seventh Edition. Boston: Bedford/St. Martins, 2008.

Students also need a dictionary. I recommend: The American Heritage Dictionary. Fourth Edition.

Along with a dictionary, the prepared student needs pens with blue or black ink, along with a pencil for annotating texts, paper, a stapler or paper clips, a travel drive to save writing, a notebook, three hole punch, a folder for work-in-progress, and a divided binder to keep materials together.

Week 1: Warm-ups and stretches
Writing Logically, Thinking Critically: Introduction, Chapter 1: Thinking and Writing

Day 1-2: In-class assignment: Aptitude Test; freewrite: Define Critical Thinking; article: What kind of thinker are you? Article: “State of Mind” by David Kruger.

Discussion: What do you know about the criminal justice system? Film: Race to Execution or Juvies.

Homework: Begin reading chapter 1 in WLTC. Complete exercises. You can write in the book. Note questions. Post freewrite on class blog: http://sabirscoaenglish5.blogspot.com

Week 2
Chapter 2: Inference—Critical Thought Assignments: p.17 due Tuesday, January 31.

The writing assignments from the text (some) will be cyber-assignments (turned in or posted on-line at the class blog). Keep a copy for yourself. Exercises: 2J, 3, 4, or 2K. Extra Credit: 2L, all due February 2.

Week 2-3
A Quick Guide to Integrating Research into Your Own Writing 210-214. Practice pp: 210-214

Readings January 31-Feb. 7 Yummy.

Essay Planning due: Feb. 9. Definition essay: What is a criminal? Why are children like Yummy categorized as criminals by society? Do you agree with this definition? Is it too narrow or too broad?

Essay Due Date: Feb. 14
Due for peer review. Final draft due Feb. 16 via Internet.

Review: Rules for Writers (Hacker):
The Writing Process (2)
Document Design (60)
The Basics (530)

Week 4: Feb. 21-23 Establish routine
Chapter 3: The Structure of Argument (53)
In class exercises: 3B (58-59), 3C. Homework Exercise 3E (cyber-assignment). Due Feb. 21 in class. Posted after class.

Chapter 4: Written Argument (77)
Cyber-assignment: Writing Assignment 7 (98-99), Writing Assignment 8 (102). Posted by February 23 after class. Bring assignments to class for review.

Hacker
Argument (358)
Conducting Research (381
Readings Tempest Tales: February 21-March 20.

Essay Assignment: The Classical Argument

Develop argument topics: Tuesday, March 20-22. Essay plan due: March 22. Essay due March 27 for peer review. Present March 29. Turn in March 30 via Internet.

Week 5-6: Fitness testing

Chapter 4 con’t. Review
Chapter 5: The Language of Argument—Definition (104)
Cyber-Assignments: Exercise 5A (110-111), Writing Assignment 10 (124)

Hacker:
Grammar (148)
Punctuation (269)
Mechanics (317)

Readings/Essay Assignment
March 29-31 start, continue through April 19: The New Jim Crow. Use Toulmin model. Essay planning and outline due April 24. Peer review due: April 26. Final draft due: April 27 or May 1. Presentation May 1.

Week 6-7:
Chapter 5 review
Chapter 6: Fallacious Arguments (131)
Cyber-assignments based on in-class assignment (145); Exercise 6B
Test

Readings/Essay Assignment: Student Choice
Choose a topic of current interest to argue a position or an argument to analyze using the Rogerian model of argument. Bring in an outline May 10. Presentation due with argument, May 15.

Week 7-8: Learning curves

Chapter 7: Deductive and Inductive Argument (157)
Cyber-assignments Exercises 7G (180) or 7H (181)
Cyber-assignment (Writing Assignment 13 (196)

Week 8-9: Home Stretch
Chapter 8, Review Textbook

Review and quiz. We will complete the textbook about midway through the course. This will allow students an opportunity to focus on their writing. I will also hand out other materials to supplement argument models not covered in Writing Logically.

Week 10-18 Essay Assignments cover this period

Finals: Portfolio Due Dates
Portfolio Due by May 25, 12 noon via Internet. We will work on this May 10 and 17 in class.


This syllabus is subject to change based on instructor assessment of class progress.

Sunday, January 22, 2012

Syllabus Letter

22 January 2012


Dear Students:

I am still on South Africa time waking at two and four in the morning. The time difference is about 10 hours between here and there. It was great when I needed a bit more time to complete something, I could go to bed and wake up in the same day—different time zone. I got up today at 4 a.m. went to sleep yesterday about six or seven in the evening. Today is my granddaughter’s birthday. She is nine. Her mother is a graduate of COA: psychology, with a BS in psychology and women’s studies from Cal State East Bay (2011).

This morning I completed a wonderful book, might I say, a mighty work (smile), entitled, Mighty Be Our Powers: How Sisterhood, Prayer, and Sex Changed a Nation at War, A Memoir, by Leyman Gbowee with Carol Mithers.

When I watched the film, Pray the Devil Back to Hell, directed by Gini Reticker, produced by Abigail E. Disney, I marveled over the courage of the Liberian women to defeat the Charles Taylor war machine with prayer and nonviolent resistance. The women assembled along the road where the president’s caravan passed twice daily. Dressed in plain white garments, these women, from the city, from the countryside, rural women, educated and uneducated women, Christian and Muslim women, women who called on the ancient indigenous spirits and goddesses, sat or stood together in the oppressive heat and in the summer storms getting wet and growing dark and weak as they became the key voice for peace in a country that was violently spinning out of control. The film is on-line at: http://www.pbs.org/wnet/women-war-and-peace/full-episodes/pray-the-devil-back-to-hell/ There are also links to other films in the series: Women, War and Peace, as well as to interviews with Ms. Gbowee.

Unlike her memoir, the film Pray the Devil Back to Hell, is a heroines’ story, the story of a nation which is confronted by its most vulnerable population, its women. It is a story, Liberia’s quest for peace is a story, a story which ends as it begins. The film could be a miniseries; the culminating event is not the end, rather the beginning, which we’d never know unless we read 2011 Nobel Peace Prize winner Gbowee’s tale of triumph and personal sacrifice. I am happy Abigail Disney told me about the memoir when we last spoke in a radio interview—what a wonderful journey is has been this weekend. I am just disappointed I wasn’t able to meet Ms. Gbowee when she was here on tour last year.

I bought the book at the college book store Thursday where I have it listed as required. I assigned it for my English 1A class, along with Half the Sky, the Pulitzer Prize winning book from the married team, Nicholas D. Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn. Students either hate the book or love it. I never know what to expect from Spring semester to Spring semester over the past three years. One criticism is the formulaic nature of the book and the fact that men are not key characters and when they are, they are often the villains.

I assigned this book after seeing the authors and a woman profiled in Half the Sky on Oprah. You can imagine my great surprise when a student told me its authors were hosting a global event for International Women’s Day in theatres throughout the country. We attended of course. Locally our event was in Emeryville. Students bought tickets and I got some free ones from a sponsoring organization in San Francisco and we went. Students said they found the film and discussion inspiring.

We will start with Gbowee and then shift into the Kristof WuDunn land where all women are suffering— Yes, it would be depressing without evidence of triumph. Gbowee’s success is not singular, that is why her story is so remarkable. However, Half the Sky is unable to go into such depth, this is why we are reading her story first.

Students in English 1A will look for a woman entrepreneur in Northern California to profile in an essay. Students will also chose a book about the woman entrepreneur or a book by a woman to write an essay exploring the memoir, autobiography or novel’s themes and topics as relates to women’s empowerment or peace. These are the major essays for English 1A. We will write a series of short essays and post on the blog, these cyber-assignments will often start in class. All cyber-assignment are interactive and students have to respond to minimally 1-3 students posts for credit for the assignment. The first cyber assignment is a response to this letter, the second is a response to the syllabus. The second response includes a private response to me. My email addresses are: coasabirenglish201@gmail.com, coasabirenglish1A@gmail.com, coasabirenglish1B@gmail.com, coasabirenglish5@gmail.com

I love memoirs and autobiographies that cover political, social and historic movements, like this one does. The Warmth of Other Suns does a similar job, except Isabel Wilkerson didn’t live it, as Gbowee does. A short book, just under 250 pages, Gbowee’s work addressed in the award winning film, Pray the Devil Back to Hell, doesn’t start until the book is nearly two thirds finished. I thought of all the murder mysteries I love where the crime is solved in the last ten pages; was this one of those reads?

Each Spring in honor of Women’s History Month in March, I have used women’s issues as the theme for the semester. So here we are again. In English 5 we are looking more are the criminalization of a population in California and in America, poor people of color, more specifically black people. California incarcerates more youth as adults than any other state and more women. I am concerned about this. I am a member of an organization called, California Coalition for Women Prisoners. We are an advocacy organization. I serve on its board.

Michelle Alexander’s book, The New Jim Crow, looks at the criminalization of a population and how this tale is not new when one looks at the historic Jim Crow polices of America’s south, instituted at the end of enslavement of an entire race for four centuries. Cornell West’s forward to the paperback edition is quite provocative as he raises questions and issues you might not be familiar with. As English 5 meets for 1 hour and 15 minutes. We will have to do a lot of preparation at home and come to class ready to talk and discuss what we have read, the theories we have explored in our text book or in other readings I will supply on other argument forms: Toulmin and Aristotelian. Writing Logically, Thinking Critically only uses the Rogerian argumentative form.

We will write four arguments using these forms. The last argument, which takes its theme from Alexander, will be an opportunity for a student to craft an argument using one of the three explored. There might be an opportunity for the “super students” to craft an argument taking on a topic they disagree with arguing its merits. Since this is an election year, it will be fun analyzing campaign speeches, looking for examples of logical fallacies or flawed logic in ads, op eds and other media.

All arguments are both written and oral. Students will present their written arguments for critique. Each of three arguments will take their topic from one of the texts. We will start with Yummy, then move to Mosely, and end with Alexander. Alexander is a hard read, so if you are a slow reader, start it early.

We are leaving Alexander for last, as I’d like to get through much of Writing Logically, along with its exercises, before we start the book. I love Walter Mosely’s work. He is one of my favorite writers since the Easy Rawlins’ series of detective novels, to his science fiction work, and lately his protagonist Socrates Fortlow novels, Fortlow who is just as thoughtful as Ezekiel "Easy" Porterhouse Rawlins, perhaps more.

One of my students in English 1A Fall 2010, shared the title with me and I checked it out from the Oakland Public Library. I read it in a day and a half and immediately decided to use it this Spring Semester. The argument is classic. How many of you ever thought the destination “hell” as negotiable (smile)? Well, Mosely’s character disagrees with his sentence and gets sent back to earth to work it out with his angel. There he meets the devil or Lucifer himself. It is a great story that makes the reader rethink her notion of right and wrong, good and evil.

When I was in Los Angeles last year in November to say good bye to a good friend who was dying, I went to the Holocaust Museum that Sunday, where the author of Yummy was receiving a book award. I hadn’t known the story of the child in Chicago. After reading Yummy, I decided to make it one of our texts this semester as it is an easy read and a story—those of us who live in urban communities can undoubtedly, unfortunately, relate to.

I also like films and in the classes longer than 50 minutes, we watch a few (smile). For English 1A, we will definitely watch, Pray the Devil Back to Hell, even if it takes two classes or I might assign it as homework (we’ll see).

Sandra Cisneros’s House on Mango Street, first, Yummy, second, and last, Always Running. Students will also read a book, a memoir of their own choosing. I suggest the sequel to Always Running, It Calls You Back.

There will be a Social Entrepreneur Essay for English 201 and English 1A students.

In English 201, we will take our freewrites in response to House on Mango Street and make a book. We’ll have a book release party with refreshments (smile). There will be five major essays, three tied to assigned textbooks, one tied to a memoir you choose, the last on the social entrepreneur.

Four of the five essays involve presentations: House on Mango Street, Always Running, SE Essay, Book Report Essay. The response to Yummy can be a graphic essay for the artistically inclined (smile). In English 201 we might read the play, Elephant Man. I see this play and its character as a metaphor for what happened to the protagonist in Yummy and what happened to Luis Rodríguez in Always Running.

I chose Always Running after many years of not teaching it, because of the recent by the author, whom I had the opportunity to interview when he was in town last November on a book tour. I loved teaching his Always Running, a classic tale similar to Down These Mean Streets by the late poet and author, Piri Thomas, Claude Brown’s Manchild in the Promised Land, Brothers and Keepers by John Edgar Wideman, and more recently, The Pact by Drs. Sampson Davis, George Jenkins, and Rameck Hunt with Lisa Frazier Page, and The Color of Water by James McBride. These coming of age tales about young men, are stories where growing up is not a given for the men who tell these stories, so how they survive proves instructive then and now.

In English 1A we will read the Greek play, Lysistrata. I also have a collection of poetry with the theme, war, which we will look at in English 1A in March as well.

I hope we can attend at least one play or author event as a community of writers. I will let students know what is opening and where. You can let me know of events you are attending as well. Films are also great, especially when the director is present or there is a discussion before or afterward.

Some students are not receiving this communiqués from me, which means, said student has no email address on file with admissions and records. Correct this omission immediately. Add an email address to your application. Make sure the phone numbers listed are the ones you are able to be reached at.

I have be using the book Stewart Pidd Hates English for too many years to recall when I started exactly, but suffice it to say over the years, “The Pidd Experience,” which many students hate as well as Pidd, has become a trademark text I have become well-known for on this campus and perhaps in the District (smile). It is a book that through a series of prescriptive exercises and essays covers many of the more salient errors writing students make which give their college teachers the most grief. The errors reviewed are both grammatical and mechanical, with an overview of summary and paraphrasing most third semester students have forgotten, not to mention a mind expanding section on plagiarism, which some scholars are not serious enough about, a slight which often comes back to haunt many a student as he or she crams at the end of the semester.

Deceptively simple, SPHE grows steadily more complex until the student who has been simply gliding along runs into major difficulty. This is around the third or fourth essays, Pronoun Case or BeVerbs. The fictional character, Stewart Pidd, supplies all the course work and students act as his teachers, grading his essays and offering comments on how he can improve by naming the errors and giving an example(s) of how he can correct the essays. These corrective essays are written as templates, which means there is little space for creativity, rather, the correct essay looks like everyone else’s, with perhaps originality in the title or often in the concluding paragraph. Many students cannot believe how simple the task is, until this simplicity is shattered by failing grades.

The essays are nonsense essays, which enable students to focus on the writing, rather than the content. This to fosters in students a false sense of competence failing grades quickly shatter. It isn’t the difficulty that gets students; it is the attention to detail that gets them over and over again.

Last semester, for the first time, I had students write an essay called, “The Stewart Pidd Experience.” I also had students write an essay where they evaluated their two grammar exams in an essay. This was a part of the class portfolio which is our final assignment. There is no sitting final in this class.

I have decided to not require Pidd for Spring Semester, except as a recommendation for all students who have never used the book before. The only class where this is not true is English 201 where I am making SPHE required. For everyone else, if your essays include errors covered in Pidd, students will have to write a correction essay outlining their errors, how to correct them and a revised essay.

The errors covered in SPHE are: confused words, sentence punctuation, pronoun agreement, pronoun case, be-verbs, possessives, verb tense, parallel structure, MLA, plagiarism, paraphrasing, summarizing, ellipsis use, signal phrases, works cited pages.

I plan to give students the quizzes and the exams, just so you can know if you need to get the book and run the exercises. Beginning Week 2, I will host a six week workshop on MW mornings (10:30-11:30) for students interested in “The Pidd Experience.” I could possibly host a meeting also on M or W afternoons, after 3 p.m., let’s say, from 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., if more than 5 students are interested. Students do not have to be in English 201 to attend. One has to commit to the entire six weeks though. The workshop is open to all Sabir students. Students in my English 1B class last semester who did not buy a grammar style book and made many errors up to the portfolio in MLA from works cited pages to ellipsis marks, received Bs instead of As in the course. For English 1A, it was crucial that students cited correctly. This is a key goal of Freshman composition. After English 1A, students are expected to know how to cite their sources and understand the importance of scholarly research when proving a point. Students are also expected to know the difference between free and literal paraphrasing, summarizing and plagiarism. It is that serious that students who are scholars know this information, so if you don’t look at the book—SPHE, and think about this short refresher workshop. Here at the College of Alameda students can also enroll in advanced Grammar in the ESL department.

I am teaching four classes: English 1B, 21792, 8-8:50 AM, MTWTh in C211; English 1A, 21757, 9-9:50 AM, MTWTh, A-202; English 5, 21763 & English 211, 21777, 11-12:15 AM, TTh, A-202; English 201A 21768 & English 201B 21774, MW, A 202, 1-2:50 PM. (The two classes ENG 201A & ENG 201B, as well as ENG 5 and ENG 211, run concurrently.)

As usual, I am looking to hold one class a week in a lab with computers so students can learn to navigate the blog and how I want essay portfolios sent to me.

If you do not have technology at home, use the computers here on campus in the LRC. There is the Open Lab and the Writing Center for your use. All you need is a Student ID, which is free. Make sure you get on early on. Students also need to sign up for a special LRC course, which is also free. Do this early in the semester as well.

For first year students, I suggest you fit College Success at COA into your schedules: Counseling 21739, MW 12-1:15, 3 Units, in C-113, with Cobb or Counseling 21738, MW 9:30-10:45, in CV-205 (portables) with Nakmo. Similar classes are offered at Laney and Merritt colleges (Peralta Colleges 2012 Schedule of Classes 96). There is a Grammar class at Laney: 20428 6-8:50 PM, Eng. 206A, English Grammar, 3 units (Peralta Colleges 2012 Spring Schedule of Classes 107).

In all except the English 5 or Critical Thinking class, I am using a new book, I hope students like or at least find useful, They Say, I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing. Oh, no, students might cry, another book that uses templates?! What is wrong with Sabir, doesn’t she trust original thought (smile). You won’t believe this, but this book has been sitting on my desk for at least five years, maybe more and it wasn’t until a former student of mine, now professor, Maria Acuna, shared it with me last semester, did I decide to try it.

I have been reading it this weekend as well and I like the premise the authors use to explain why they wrote it. Granted, templates can get tiresome, but for those who are familiar with Stewart Pidd Hates English, these templates are nothing like the ones Pollitt and Baker use. Rest assured there (smile). Instead, this book helps students enter the discourse or conversation, often one which has been raging or simmering or bubbling over for a short or long while, a conversation you have never entered, however, one which affects your life in profound ways. Why haven’t you joined in? Often, the reason certain communities are not called to the table or invited to participate is intentional. The reason is, to do so doesn’t serve the interests of the body politic at the table.

Whether one is invited or not, whether one has a chair or not, whether one has the proper suit or proper language with which to engage those at the table using one’s life as a ping pong, the conversation is open in a democracy and it is yours to join even in an assignment for a class such as ours. I have students who have used their writing here to launch careers in politics. I have had students publish writing completed here in class in newspapers and respected journals. We are working in a laboratory where results can actually change lives beginning with our own. What you learn here is not “academic” if academic means useless. Each of you is a change agent; that is why you took time out of your life to show up.

Showing up is important. We all showed up for different reasons, some not as lofty as others, but you are here and because you are here, I expect great work from you. That is my goal and that is why and I am here and when you start hating me, remember, the promise I made to you here: meritocracy will never get a reward in this class. There is no grading on the curve. Everyone is held to a high standard and while I set the bar, well the State of California sets the bar and some of you will not reach it this time— keep trying and you will eventually.

The class might appear disorganized and I smile a lot and seem easy, this is an illusion. I am not easy. I demand a lot from each of you, but this is college—and you expect huge demands right? Don’t worry, I think you will get your money’s worth and then some. I do not assign writing assignments because I have nothing better to do. I can think or many tasks I love more than reading first drafts of students’ papers—you think they are final drafts, but they are not. I am a professional writer and I know what I am doing, so trust me when I tell you something is wrong. It is not personal, rather it is the writing not you I am critiquing. Some students enter the class with more skill sets than others. Some expect success in high school to tide them over here, and have rude awakenings. My suggestion is to come to class awake and sleep at home the night before.

I hope students surprise me and actually know a bit about the writing process and can read with comprehension and most importantly, are not lazy. You can enroll in this class not knowing everything, but if you do not exert yourself and fill in those spaces where perhaps time or preparation left you under-ready then, I expect you to get the extra help needed, whether that is attending my “Pidd Experience” workshop or a getting a tutor or both.

Be honest with yourself and do what you need to do to be successful here. Do not waste your time or your classmates. I will not let you waste mine or theirs or use my brain as your own. I do not suffer fools at all. Some students say I am rude, perhaps I am; however, when students are not prepared and want to waste the time of those who are, I cut them off. I am not interested in anything an unprepared student has to say. If you ever come to class unprepared, keep silent. Do not open your mouth except to tell us you are not prepared and are just observing that day.

I have to pay out of pocket for an assistant to help me with record keeping. I haven’t had a student aide in years to help students with their essays, so it’s on me and you. If you need help I can help you to a point—there is no magic. I am a great writer because I write and I kept writing when I got failing grades, had to take remedial writing classes at UC Berkeley, and got failing grades on first drafts at Holy Names.

Believe it or not, I didn’t know what a thesis sentence was until graduate school Teaching Writing course. I do not have hours to spend with one student a week, but you can get assistance, so ask when there are questions. I think faster than I write sometimes and I am an awful speller. No one is perfect. Learn what your strengths are. I have an almost photographic memory. Writing things down is a way for me to record them in my mind almost verbatim. I don’t hold hands and after last semester, a deadline is a deadline even if only one student makes it, so keep the due dates in your calendar, just in case I forget to remind you when something is due.

The blog is a place where reminders tend to go, but if you have limited access to the web, take good notes from the white board and get a few students phones numbers just in case. I suggest students hold study sessions to discuss readings and assignments. The library (first floor in the LRC or Learning Resource Center) has classrooms students can use for discussions.

Each class has varying requirements for the writing, which is about 6-8,000 words. I tend to assign more writing. In English 1A, students will have several short research essays, rather than one long essay. Each essay in English 1A will be about 3-4 pages, 250 words a page. In English 5 3-4 pages per essay. This is minimally. Essays can be a bit longer. In English 201 essays will be between 2-5 pages depending on the level. English 1B, 3-4 pages. This excludes the works cited page.

I am giving you all this in advance so you can drop the course and find a better fit.

Recap on textbooks. Find your class:

1. English 5: Michelle Alexander's The New Jim Crow; Walter Mosley's The Tempest Tales; Yummy: the Last Days of a Southside Shorty by G. Neri, and Writing Logically, Thinking Critically 6th Edition. Recommended: Diana Hacker’s Rules for Writers, American Heritage Dictionary.


2.English 1B:

Gardner, Janet E. Writing about Literature: A Portable Guide. Second Edition. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2009. Print.

Grover, Linda Legarde. The Dance Boots. Athens, Georgia and London: The University of Georgia Press, 2010. Print.

Kwok, Jean. Girl in Translation. New York: Riverhead Books, 2010. Print.

Satrapi, Marjane. The Complete Persepolis. Pantheon Books, 2007. Print. ISBN 0375714839

Bannerjee, Neelanjana and Summi Kaipa, Pireeni Sundaralingam. Ed. Indivisible: An Anthology of Contemporary South Asian Poetry. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Press, 2010. Print.


Recommended: Diana Hacker’s Rules for Writers, 4-7th editions. American Heritage Dictionary.

3. English 1A: Half the Sky: Turning Oppression Into Opportunity for Women Worldwide, by Nicholas D. Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn; Mighty Be Our Powers: How Sisterhood, Prayer, and Sex Changed a Nation at War by Leymah Gbowee, Diana Hacker Rules for Writers, American Heritage Dictionary. They Say, I Say, Second Edition, by Gerald Graff and Cathy Birenstein.

Recommended for students who have not taken my classes before: Stewart Pidd Hates English.

4. English 201A: Stewart Pidd Hates English*, Yummy: the Last Days of a Southside Shorty by G. Neri, The House on Mango Street by Sandra Cisneros, Always Running: Gang Days in LA by Luis Rodriguez. American Heritage Dictionary.

English 201B: for Pidd Alumni: Diana Hacker’s Rules for Writers and They Say, I Say by Gerald Graff and Cathy Birenstein. If a student has not had me for English 201A then Pidd is recommended.

Sincerely,

Wanda Sabir

English Professor, College of Alameda

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Course Materials for Spring 2012

Greetings Students:

Welcome to English 5/211!

Course materials for all Sabir courses Spring 2012. Find your class:

1. English 5: Michelle Alexander's The New Jim Crow; Walter Mosley's The Tempest Tales, Yummy: the Last Days of a Southside Shorty by G. Neri, and Writing Logically, Thinking Critically 6th Edition. Recommended: Diana Hacker Rules for Writers, American Heritage Dictionary.


2. English 1B: The Dance Boots, Girl in Translation, The Complete Persepolis, Indivisible: An Anthology of Contemporary South Asian Poetry, Writing about Literature: A Portable Guide. Second Edition, Janet E. Gardner. Recommended: Diana Hacker Rules for Writers, American Heritage Dictionary.


3. English 1A: Half the Sky: Turning Oppression Into Opportunity for Women Worldwide, Mighty Be Our Powers: How Sisterhood, Prayer, and Sex Changed a Nation at War by Leymah Gbowee, Diana Hacker Rules for Writers, American Heritage Dictionary. They Say, I Say, SE by Gerald Graff and Cathy Birenstein.

Recommended for students who have not taken my classes before: Stewart Pidd Hates English.


4. English 201A: Stewart Pidd Hates English*, Yummy: the Last Days of a Southside Shorty by G. Neri, The House on Mango Street by Sandra Cisneros, Always Running: Gang Days in LA by Luis Rodriguez. American Heritage Dictionary.


English 201B: for Pidd Alumni: Diana Hacker Rules for Writers and They Say, I Say by Gerald Graff and Cathy Birenstein. If a student has not had me for English 201A then Pidd is recommended.